Compare · 2 products compared

AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GBvsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super are both dedicated desktop graphics cards built on different architectures. Choosing between them comes down to a trade-off between lower power consumption with more video memory and higher raw compute capability.

Report a problem

Intro

What is the problem?

eBay prices refresh hourly — check the listing before you buy. We may earn a commission.

Report a problem

Best for

What is the problem?
Which products? Tick all that apply, or none if you are not sure.

Biggest differences

  • Shader cores

    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super leads

    3.5×

    higher is better

    • AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB2,048 cores
    • NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super7,168 cores
  • Launch price

    AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB leads

    −42%

    lower is better

    • AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB349 USD
    • NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super599 USD
  • Memory bandwidth

    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super leads

    +57%

    higher is better

    • AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB320 GB/s
    • NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super504 GB/s
  • Memory bus width

    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super leads

    +50%

    higher is better

    • AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB128 bit
    • NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super192 bit

Where each one wins

  • AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

    • Launch price
    • Boost clock
    • Video memory
    • Board power
    • Recommended PSU
    • PCIe version
    • HDMI version
    • DisplayPort version
  • NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super

    • Shader cores
    • FP32 compute
    • Memory type
    • Memory bus width
    • Memory bandwidth
    • Memory speed
    • Last-level cache
    • DisplayPort outputs
    • Max displays

What both have

  • PCIe lanes16 lanes
  • HDMI outputs1 ports

Every spec

Red marks the better value in each row.

SpecAMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GBNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super
Overview

Report a problem

Overview specs

What is the problem?
Which specs? Tick all that apply, or none if you are not sure.
Which products? Tick all that apply, or none if you are not sure.
Release date2025-062024-01
Launch price349 USD1599 USD
Graphics chip

Report a problem

Graphics chip specs

What is the problem?
Which specs? Tick all that apply, or none if you are not sure.
Which products? Tick all that apply, or none if you are not sure.
ArchitectureRdna 4Ada lovelace
Shader cores2,048 cores7,168 cores
Boost clock3,130 MHz2,475 MHz
Base clockNot published1,980 MHz
FP32 compute25.6 TFLOPS35.5 TFLOPS
Memory

Report a problem

Memory specs

What is the problem?
Which specs? Tick all that apply, or none if you are not sure.
Which products? Tick all that apply, or none if you are not sure.
Video memory16 GB12 GB
Memory typeGddr6Gddr6x
Memory bus width128 bit192 bit
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s504 GB/s
Memory speed20 Gbps21 Gbps
Last-level cache32 MB48 MB
Power

Report a problem

Power specs

What is the problem?
Which specs? Tick all that apply, or none if you are not sure.
Which products? Tick all that apply, or none if you are not sure.
Board power160 W220 W
Recommended PSU450 W600 W
Power connectors8-pin12V-2x62
Interface

Report a problem

Interface specs

What is the problem?
Which specs? Tick all that apply, or none if you are not sure.
Which products? Tick all that apply, or none if you are not sure.
PCIe version5.04.0
PCIe lanes16 lanes16 lanes
Display outputs

Report a problem

Display outputs specs

What is the problem?
Which specs? Tick all that apply, or none if you are not sure.
Which products? Tick all that apply, or none if you are not sure.
HDMI version2.1b2.1
DisplayPort version2.1a1.4a
HDMI outputs1 ports31 ports
DisplayPort outputs2 ports43 ports
Max displays3 displays4 displays
Video engine

Report a problem

Video engine specs

What is the problem?
Which specs? Tick all that apply, or none if you are not sure.
Which products? Tick all that apply, or none if you are not sure.
Hardware encodeH.264, HEVC, AV1AV1
Video encodersNot publishedNot published
Size

Report a problem

Size specs

What is the problem?
Which specs? Tick all that apply, or none if you are not sure.
Which products? Tick all that apply, or none if you are not sure.
Card lengthNot publishedNot published
Card heightNot publishedNot published
Slot widthNot publishedNot published
Notes on 4 values — test conditions and caveats
  1. 1AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB, Launch price: Launch MSRP was $349, but most 16GB models initially sold higher; Tom's Hardware saw them starting at $389.
  2. 2NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super, Power connectors: Nvidia's 16-pin header is the 12V-2x6 variant; an adapter cable for non-ATX 3.0 power supplies ships with the card.
  3. 3AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB, HDMI outputs: AMD sells no reference card; this is the reference-design I/O. Partner cards can differ (Sapphire Pulse: 2 HDMI, 1 DP).
  4. 4AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB, DisplayPort outputs: AMD sells no reference card; this is the reference-design I/O. Partner cards can differ (Sapphire Pulse: 2 HDMI, 1 DP).

Performance and Compute

The GeForce RTX 4070 Super relies on 7,168 shader cores to drive its 35.5 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power, outperforming the AMD alternative in pure parallel math tasks. Meanwhile, the Radeon RX 9060 XT achieves a higher 3,130 MHz boost clock while maintaining a much lower board power requirement of 160 W.

For buyers, the NVIDIA card delivers heavier number-crunching power at the expense of a 220 W board power draw and a required 600 W power supply. The AMD card keeps system heat down and runs on a modest 450 W power supply.

Report a problem

Performance and Compute

What is the problem?

Memory and Bandwidth

The Radeon card equips 16 GB of GDDR6 video memory over a 128-bit bus, offering a 320 GB/s bandwidth and a 32 MB last-level cache. In comparison, the GeForce card provides 12 GB of faster GDDR6X memory across a 192-bit bus, reaching a 504 GB/s bandwidth with a 48 MB cache.

Buyers working with large texture assets or high-resolution frame buffers benefit from the extra capacity on the AMD option. Those prioritizing rapid memory transactions will find the higher bandwidth and GDDR6X type on the NVIDIA option more advantageous.

Report a problem

Memory and Bandwidth

What is the problem?

Connectivity and Efficiency

The AMD card advances interface standards by featuring PCIe 5.0 and DisplayPort 2.1a connectivity. The NVIDIA card relies on PCIe 4.0 and DisplayPort 1.4a, though it supports up to four maximum displays compared to the three on the Radeon competitor.

System builders matching modern motherboards gain future-ready interface speeds with the Radeon model. Multi-monitor setups gain extra flexibility from the extra display output capacity on the GeForce model.

Report a problem

Connectivity and Efficiency

What is the problem?

The Verdict

Buy the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB if you want lower power draw, PCIe 5.0 support, and 16 GB of video memory for a lower launch price. Buy the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super if you need higher FP32 compute performance and faster GDDR6X memory bandwidth.

Report a problem

Verdict

What is the problem?

Where to buy

  • AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

    Best for Budget-conscious builders wanting lower power draw and 16GB VRAM

  • NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super

    Best for Users needing higher compute performance and faster memory bandwidth

FAQ

What power supply do these graphics cards require?

The AMD card requires a 450 W power supply, while the NVIDIA card requires a 600 W power supply.

Which card has better video encoding support?

The AMD card supports H.264, HEVC, and AV1 hardware encoding, whereas the NVIDIA card lists hardware encode support only for AV1.

What power connectors do they use?

The AMD card uses a single 8-pin connector, while the NVIDIA card uses a 12V-2x6 16-pin header.

Report a problem

FAQ

What is the problem?

Spotted something wrong? Tap the next to any section or spec group to let us know. Every report is read.